si wrote: ›
eXplorer: bohuzial si uz nepamatam presne ako som musel to ospf znasilnit aby mi to chodilo a kedze ten prepoj (tiez nad cudzou infrastrukturou) uz nemam tak nemozem ani obcumnut z konfiguraku

Quote: › ospf packets have a ttl of 1, because neighbors have to be directly
connected (1 hop). now if you dont specify the ttl=50, the ip header of
the encapsulating packet (the gre packet) inherits this ttl=1 from the
encapsulated packet (the ospf packet).

obviously, a ttl=1 is not sufficient for the gre packet if you have
multiple hops between the ends of the tunnel, hence the ttl=50.

i only noticed this by running a trace in the middle of my tunnel and
seeing the icmp ttl exceeded packets being generated.

please tell me if i am talking rubbish... (and include a more feasable
theory)

paul

andreas4all wrote: ›ok diki, dnes to testnem, ale asi viem kde je pes zakopany, teda aspon dufam. Bude to kvoli dalsiemu radiu, ktore sa pripaja na toto AP, a tam sme OSPF nekonfigurovali... vecer sa uvidi.

si wrote: ›airbilly: ja si zas nemyslim zeby dalsi klient na AP mal byt problem... teda aspon volakedy som take na sieti mal ze na jednom AP boli 2ja klienti z toho jedno slo na router na dalsom retranse a druhe bol rodinny dom (takze ziaden router) a ospf s tym ziaden problem nemalo...